Assertion :The standard reduction potential for Ag++e−→Ag is half that of 2Ag++2e−→2Ag Reason: Standard potential is dependent on the number of electrons transferred
Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion
Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect
Both Assertion and Reason are incorrect
A
Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion
B
Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect
C
Both Assertion and Reason are incorrect
D
Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
Open in App
Solution
Verified by Toppr
Assertion The standard reduction potential for Ag++e−→Ag is equal to that of 2Ag++2e−→2Ag Reason Standard potential is independent of the number of electrons transferred. Hence, both Assertion and Reason are incorrect.
Was this answer helpful?
0
Similar Questions
Q1
Assertion :The standard reduction potential for Ag++e−→Ag is half that of 2Ag++2e−→2Ag Reason: Standard potential is dependent on the number of electrons transferred
View Solution
Q2
Assertion : Two electrons of helium atom are placed in only one shell but three electrons of lithium need two shells. Reason: A shell can have maximum 2n2 electrons.
View Solution
Q3
Assertion: The compressibility factor for H2 and He is (1+PbRT) Reason: The compressibility factor for H2 and He can be derived from Van der Waal's equation.
View Solution
Q4
Assertion – The non-fusible impurities present in iron ore are removed by CaCO3 .
Reason: CaCO3 which decomposes into CaO and CO2. The CaO formed reacts with SiO2 to remove silica
View Solution
Q5
Assertion: The impurities such as SiO2 present in iron ore is removed by CaCO3.
Reason: CaO formed by decomposition of CaCO3 reacts with SiO2 to form slag.