Assertion :Pure liquids and solids can be ignored while writing the equilibrium constant expression for heterogeneous equilibria. Reason: The concentration of pure liquids and solids does not remain constant.
Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion
Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect
Both Assertion and Reason are incorrect
A
Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
B
Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion
C
Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect
D
Both Assertion and Reason are incorrect
Open in App
Solution
Verified by Toppr
The concentration of pure liquids and solids remain constant, and these terms are merged in the equilibrium constant. That is why pure liquids and solids are ignored while writing the equilibrium constant expressions.
Was this answer helpful?
0
Similar Questions
Q1
Assertion :Pure liquids and solids can be ignored while writing the equilibrium constant expression for heterogeneous equilibria. Reason: The concentration of pure liquids and solids does not remain constant.
View Solution
Q2
Assertion: The compressibility factor for H2 and He is (1+PbRT) Reason: The compressibility factor for H2 and He can be derived from Van der Waal's equation.
View Solution
Q3
Assertion (A) Rate constant determined from Arrhenius equation are fairly accurate for simple as well as complex molecules.
Reason (R) Reactant molecules undergo chemical change irrespective of their orientation during collision.
(a) Both assertion and reason are correct and the reason is correct explanation of assertion (b) Both assertion and reason are correct, but reason does not explain assertion. (c) Assertion is correct, but reason is incorrect (d) Both assertion and reason are incorrect (e) Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.
View Solution
Q4
Assertion
Lithium sulphate does not form alums.
Reason
Li+ is too small to form a stable lattice required for double-salt/alum formation.
View Solution
Q5
Assertion (A) Order of the reaction can be zero or fractional.
Reason (R) We cannot determine order from balanced chemical equation.
(a) Both assertion and reason are correct and the reason is correct explanation of assertion (b) Both assertion and reason are correct, but reason does not explain assertion. (c) Assertion is correct, but reason is incorrect (d) Both assertion and reason are incorrect (e) Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.