0
You visited us 0 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

Answer carefully:

(a) Two large conducting spheres carrying charges Q1 and Q2 are brought close to each other. Is the magnitude of electrostatic force between them exactly given by Q1Q2/4πϵ0r2, where r is the distance between their centres?

(b) If Coulomb's law involved 1/r3 dependence (instead of 1/r2),would Gauss' law be still true ?

(c) A small test charge is released at rest at a point in an electrostatic field configuration. Will it travel along the field line passing through that point?

(d) What is the work done by the field of a nucleus in a complete circular orbit of the electron? What if the orbit is elliptical?

(e) We know that electric field is discontinuous across the surface of a charged conductor. Is electric potential also discontinuous there?

(f) What meaning would you give to the capacitance of a single conductor?

(g) Guess a possible reason why water has a much greater dielectric constant (= 80) than say, mica (= 6).

Solution
Verified by Toppr


(a) According to the question, two large conducting spheres with charge Q1 and Q2 are placed such that displacement between their center is r. Then, the magnitude of electrostatic force between the two spheres is not exactly equal to Q1Q24πϵ0r2

Since the magnitude of electrostatic force between two point charges Q1 and Q2 placed at a distance r is given by the relation,

F=Q1Q24πϵ0r2


(b) Gauss's law states that net electric flux through the surface is the electric field of the charge enclosed by the surface multiplied by the area of the surface projected in a plane perpendicular to the field and this product is a constant equal to charge enclosed within the surface divided by ϵ0

i.e. ϕ=E.dA

or ϕ=Qϵ0

where, ϕ= electric flux,

E= electric field

dA= elementary area vector of the surface

Q= charge enclosed by the surface

ϵ0= permitivity of free space

Since, electric field involves 1r2 and area vector involves the term of r2, therefore the product becomes constant.

But, if Coulomb's law involves 1r3 dependence, product of electric field and area vector Gauss's law will not be true.


(c) If a small test charge is released at rest at a point in an electrostatic fields configuration, then it will travel along the field lines passing through that point, as the tangent drawn at a point on the field line gives the direction of acceleration at that point.


(d) When the electron completes an orbit, either circular or elliptical, the displacement becomes zero, so the work done by the field of a nucleus is zero.

Work = Force × Displacement


(e) Electric field is discontinuous across the surface of a charged conductor, but the electric potential is continuous.


(f) The capacitance of a single conductor means a capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor with one plate as the conductor while the other placed at infinity.


(g) Water has a permanent dipole moment while mica doesn't, because water has an unsymmetrical space as compared to mica. So, water has a greater dielectric constant than mica.


Was this answer helpful?
4
Similar Questions
Q1
Answer carefully:

(a) Two large conducting spheres carrying charges Q1 and Q2 are brought close to each other. Is the magnitude of electrostatic force between them exactly given by Q1Q2/4πϵ0r2, where r is the distance between their centres?

(b) If Coulomb's law involved 1/r3 dependence (instead of 1/r2),would Gauss' law be still true ?

(c) A small test charge is released at rest at a point in an electrostatic field configuration. Will it travel along the field line passing through that point?

(d) What is the work done by the field of a nucleus in a complete circular orbit of the electron? What if the orbit is elliptical?

(e) We know that electric field is discontinuous across the surface of a charged conductor. Is electric potential also discontinuous there?

(f) What meaning would you give to the capacitance of a single conductor?

(g) Guess a possible reason why water has a much greater dielectric constant (= 80) than say, mica (= 6).
View Solution
Q2
A small test charge is released at rest at a point in an electrostatic field configuration. Will it travel along the line of force?
View Solution
Q3

(a) Show that the normal component of electrostatic field has a discontinuity from one side of a charged surface to another given by

Where is a unit vector normal to the surface at a point and σ is the surface charge density at that point. (The direction of is from side 1 to side 2.) Hence show that just outside a conductor, the electric field is σ

(b) Show that the tangential component of electrostatic field is continuous from one side of a charged surface to another. [Hint: For (a), use Gauss’s law. For, (b) use the fact that work done by electrostatic field on a closed loop is zero.]

View Solution
Q4
Assertion :Work done by the electrostatic field on a charge moving around a closed circular or elliptical path will be zero. Reason: Electrostatic field is a conservative field.
View Solution
Q5
a)Show that the normal component of electrostatic field has adiscontinuity from one side of a charged surface to anothergiven by (E2-E1).^n=σ/ϵwhere ˆn is a unit vector normal to the surface at a point ands is the surface charge density at that point. (The direction ofˆnis from side 1 to side 2.) Hence, show that just outside aconductor, the electric field is s ˆn /e0.b) Show that the tangential component of electrostatic field iscontinuous from one side of a charged surface to another. [Hint:For (a), use Gauss’s law. For, (b) use the fact that work done byelectrostatic field on a closed loop is zero.]
View Solution