How was the Civil Disobedience Movement different from the Non-Cooperation Movement-

Question

Toppr Admin · Accepted Answer

Non- Cooperation Movement-xA0-xA0-Civil-Disobedience Movement-xA0-It was launched in 1920s-xA0-It was launched in 1930s-The Non-Cooperation Movement sought to bring the working of the government to a standstill by not cooperating with the administration-The Civil Disobedience Movement was an attempt at paralysing the administration by breaking some specific rules -amp- regulations-There were no tax campaigns in this movement-It involved non- payment of taxes -amp- land-revenue as well as violation of laws-Many leaders renounced their titles -amp- left their government jobs-It involved defiance of salt laws- boycott of liquor- foreign cloth -amp- British goods of all kinds-It was not violent until the Chauri Chaura incident took place-The movement became violent in a matter of time-

Non- Cooperation Movement	Civil Disobedience Movement
It was launched in 1920s.	It was launched in 1930s.
The Non-Cooperation Movement sought to bring the working of the government to a standstill by not cooperating with the administration.	The Civil Disobedience Movement was an attempt at paralysing the administration by breaking some specific rules & regulations.
There were no tax campaigns in this movement.	It involved non- payment of taxes & land-revenue as well as violation of laws.
Many leaders renounced their titles & left their government jobs.	It involved defiance of salt laws, boycott of liquor, foreign cloth & British goods of all kinds.
It was not violent until the Chauri Chaura incident took place.	The movement became violent in a matter of time.

How was the Civil Disobedience Movement different from the Non-Cooperation Movement?