State two reasons why historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India-

Question

Toppr Admin · Accepted Answer

The two-reasons why historians refute the claim that the British introduced the Rule of-Law in India are-Colonial law was arbitrary-Indian nationalists played a prominent role in the development of the legal-sphere in British India-

State two reasons why historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India.

The two reasons why historians refute the claim that the British introduced the Rule of Law in India are
Colonial law was arbitrary.
Indian nationalists played a prominent role in the development of the legal sphere in British India.

State two reasons why historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India.

The two reasons why historians refute the claim that the British introduced the Rule of Law in India are Colonial law was arbitrary. Indian nationalists played a prominent role in the development of the legal sphere in British India.

The two reasons why historians refute the claim that the British introduced the Rule of Law in India are
Colonial law was arbitrary.
Indian nationalists played a prominent role in the development of the legal sphere in British India.