Assertion -The p-K-a- value of -I- is lower than the p-K-a- value of -II- Reason- Non-aromatic compounds are stable than anti-aromatic compounds-Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation AssertionBoth Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation AssertionAssertion is correct but Reason is incorrectAssertion is incorrect but Reason is correct

Question

Toppr Admin · Accepted Answer

-I- is non-aromatic and -II- is antiaromatic-Non-aromatic compounds are more stable than antiaromatic-Hence- -I- is a stronger acid than -II-Hence- it has lower pKa value-Thus- Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion-

(I) is non-aromatic and (II) is antiaromatic.Non-aromatic compounds are more stable than antiaromatic.Hence, (I) is a stronger acid than (II).Hence, it has lower pKa value.Thus, Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion.

(I) is non-aromatic and (II) is antiaromatic.
Non-aromatic compounds are more stable than antiaromatic.
Hence, (I) is a stronger acid than (II).
Hence, it has lower $p K a$ value.
Thus, Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion.