We know that, whole numbers are, 0,1,2,3,4,5,........∞
Hence smaller whole number is =0
So, 0 has no any predecessor;
Hence, this is the answer.
Was this answer helpful?
1
Similar Questions
Q1
The whole number 0 has no predecessor.
View Solution
Q2
The whole number which has no predecessor is
(a) 1
(b) 0
(c) 2
(d) none of these
View Solution
Q3
Write (T) for true and (F) for false against each of the following statements:
(i) Zero is the smallest natural number.
(ii) Zero is the smallest whole number.
(iii) Every whole number is a natural number.
(iv) Every natural number is a whole number.
(v) 1 is the smallest whole number.
(vi) The natural number 1 has no predecessor.
(vii) The whole number 1 has no predecessor.
(viii) The whole number 0 has no predecessor.
(ix) The predecessor of a two-digit number is never a single-digit number.
(x) The successor of a two-digit number is always a two-digit number.
(xi) 500 is the predecessor of 499.
(xii) 7000 is the successor of 6999.
View Solution
Q4
Which of
the following statements are true (T) and which are false (F)?
(a) Zero
is the smallest natural number.
(b) 400 is
the predecessor of 399.
(c) Zero
is the smallest whole number.
(d) 600 is
the successor of 599.
(e) All
natural numbers are whole numbers.
(f) All
whole numbers are natural numbers.
(g) The
predecessor of a two digit number is never a single digit number.
(h) 1 is
the smallest whole number.
(i) The
natural number 1 has no predecessor.
(j) The
whole number 1 has no predecessor.
(k) The
whole number 13 lies between 11 and 12.
(l) The
whole number 0 has no predecessor.
(m) The
successor of a two digit number is always a two digit number.
View Solution
Q5
Question 8(l)
Check whether the following statement is true (T) or false (F): The whole number 0 has no predecessor.