0
You visited us 0 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

Assertion :Young's modulus for a perfectly plastic body is zero. Reason: For a perfectly plastic body, restoring force is zero.
  1. Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
  2. Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion
  3. Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect
  4. Both Assertion and Reason are incorrect

A
Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion
B
Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
C
Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect
D
Both Assertion and Reason are incorrect
Solution
Verified by Toppr

Young's modulus is only defined for the elastic part of the stress strain curve. So for a plastic body, it won't be defined.
Statement 2 is correct as plasticity means original shape is not regained, so regaining force should be zero for a perfectly plastic material.

Was this answer helpful?
0
Similar Questions
Q1
Assertion :Young's modulus for a perfectly plastic body is zero. Reason: For a perfectly plastic body, restoring force is zero.
View Solution
Q2
Assertion: The compressibility factor for H2​ and He is (1+PbRT)
Reason: The compressibility factor for H2​ and He can be derived from Van der Waal's equation.
View Solution
Q3

ASSERTION: n-Pentane and n-Hexane belong to a homologous series.

REASON: n-Pentane and n-Hexane belong to the same class of hydrocarbons and they differ by a - CH2 - group.


View Solution
Q4

Assertion – The non-fusible impurities present in iron ore are removed by CaCO3 .

Reason: CaCO3 which decomposes into CaO and CO2. The CaO formed reacts with SiO2 to remove silica


View Solution
Q5

Assertion (A) Order of the reaction can be zero or fractional.

Reason (R) We cannot determine order from balanced chemical equation.

(a) Both assertion and reason are correct and the reason is correct explanation of assertion
(b) Both assertion and reason are correct, but reason does not explain assertion.
(c) Assertion is correct, but reason is incorrect
(d) Both assertion and reason are incorrect
(e) Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.

View Solution